Gilliam v. Steffen et al, No. 4:2019cv00740 - Document 16 (E.D. Ark. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing with prejudice Gilliam's claims against defendant Hodge; dismissing without prejudice Gilliam's deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/28/2020. (kdr)

Download PDF
Gilliam v. Steffen et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION RICHARD GILLIAM ADC #209415 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:19-cv-00740 BSM STEFFEN, OIC, Lonoke County Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“RD”) from United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe [Doc. No. 5] has been received. After careful review of the record, the RD is adopted. Gilliam’s claims against defendant Hodge are dismissed with prejudice. Gilliam’s deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim is dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of January 2020. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.