Reagan v. Rendon et al, No. 4:2019cv00152 - Document 53 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 51 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing without prejudice 2 Mr. Reagan's complaint; denying as moot 48 defendants' motion for summary judgment; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/25/2021. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reagan v. Rendon et al Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION DARREN L. REAGAN Reg. #37109-177 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:19-cv-00152-KGB-JJV ARTURO RENDON, Counselor FCC Forrest City; et al., DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 51). Plaintiff Darren L. Reagan has not filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Reagan’s complaint under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (Id., at 2). The Court denies as moot defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 48). The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this 25th day of January, 2021. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
