Davis v. Holiday et al, No. 4:2018cv00765 - Document 12 (E.D. Ark. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 11 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice this case; and counting this dismissal as a "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/6/2019. (cmn)

Download PDF
Davis v. Holiday et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JONATHON S. DAVIS v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:18-CV-00765 BSM DOC HOLIDAY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney’s proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 11] are adopted. This case is dismissed without prejudice, and this dismissal counts as a “strike” for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of February 2019. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.