Coppock v. Ryals et al, No. 4:2017cv00662 - Document 18 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER rejecting 5 the proposed findings and recommendations. When Coppock's objections are viewed as a motion to amend his complaint, it is clear, based on Eighth Circuit precedent, that he has sufficiently alleged a remediable claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/28/2017. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Coppock v. Ryals et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JASON COPPOCK v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00662 BSM TIM RYALS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 5], plaintiff Jason Coppock’s objections thereto [Doc. Nos. 9, 10], and the entire the record have been reviewed, and the proposed findings and recommendations are rejected. When Coppock’s objections are viewed as a motion to amend his complaint, it is clear, based on Eighth Circuit precedent, that he has sufficiently alleged a remediable claim. See Day v. Norris, 219 F. App’x 608, 610 (8th Cir. 2007). IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
