Tiger v. Aramark et al, No. 4:2017cv00508 - Document 84 (E.D. Ark. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 83 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting 79 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's complaint against defendants; and denying 82 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/29/2018. (cmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Tiger v. Aramark et al Doc. 84 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DAVID DEON TIGER, ADC #146435 v. PLAINTIFF 4:17CV00508-JLH-JTK ARAMARK, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Document #83. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and plaintiff’s complaint against defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. Document #79. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Document #82. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2018. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
