Wood v. Kelley et al, No. 4:2016cv00891 - Document 10 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; constituting dismissal of this action as a "strike" within th e meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/17/2017. (mef)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wood v. Kelley et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION HOWARD WOOD, ADC #155339 V. PLAINTIFF 4:16CV00891-SWW-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of February, 2017. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
