Adams v. Williams et al, No. 4:2016cv00813 - Document 12 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety the 11 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Norman Adams's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/30/2017. (ljb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Adams v. Williams et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NORMAN ADAMS ADC #136063 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00813 BSM C. WILLIAMS, Lieutenant, White County Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 11] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, plaintiff Norman Adams’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Furthermore, it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of May 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
