Cosey v. Ross et al, No. 4:2016cv00763 - Document 15 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 7 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing with prejudice Cosey's property claim for failure to state a claim; and dismissing without prejudice, defendants Brawn, Vaughn, Lacey, and Hawk, for failure to state a claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/2/2017. (kdr)

Download PDF
Cosey v. Ross et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ARTHUR LEE COSEY v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00763 BSM ROSS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. Plaintiff Arthur Cosey has filed no objections. After carefully reviewing the proposed findings and recommendations, they are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Cosey’s property claim is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and defendants Brawn, Vaughn, Lacey, and Hawk are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of February 2017. __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.