Murray v. Holladay et al, No. 4:2016cv00619 - Document 54 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 52 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Thompson's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/21/2017. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Murray v. Holladay et al Doc. 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES H. MURRAY, ADC # 91715 v. PLAINTIFF 4:16CV00619-JM DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff, Pulaski County; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Thompson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) is GRANTED and this cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 21st day of February, 2017. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
