Prowse v. Randall et al, No. 4:2016cv00511 - Document 24 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing this action without prejudice; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)

Download PDF
Prowse v. Randall et al Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION STANSEL ALEXANDER PROWSE ADC # 658340 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:16-cv-00511-KGB/JTK JOHN RANDALL, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 22). The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. This action is dismissed without prejudice. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this the 27th day of June, 2017. _________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Court Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.