Peel v. Jackson County Sheriff Department et al, No. 4:2016cv00224 - Document 80 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 79 Proposed Findings and Recommendations that the Clerk amend the docket to reflect Defendant Melanie Jones-Foster's full name; that Defendant Jones's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff's c laims against Defendant Jones are dismissed with prejudice; and that Defendant Jones' 77 Motion to Dismiss is also granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/21/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
Peel v. Jackson County Sheriff Department et al Doc. 80 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DEBRA PEEL v. PLAINTIFF 4:16CV00224-JM-JJV JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; et al. DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk amend the docket to reflect Defendant Melanie Jones-Foster’s full name. (Doc. No. 34 at 1.) 2. Defendant Jones’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 71) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Jones are DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Defendant Jones’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 77) also is GRANTED. 5. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 21st day of August, 2017. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.