Mann v Does, No. 4:2015cv00713 - Document 11 (E.D. Ark. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER adopting the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety and dismissing Mr. Mann's consolidated 1 Complaint, with prejudice as frivolous. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/30/2016. (rhm)

Download PDF
Mann v Does Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RANDEEP SINGH MANN, REG. #24775-009 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:15-cv-00710 KGB/JTK DR. JOHNSON, et al. DEFENDANTS Consolidated With: RANDEEP SINGH MANN, REG. #24775-009 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:15-cv-00713 SWW/JTK DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 13). The Court previously granted two motions for extensions of time to file objections filed by plaintiff Randeep Singh Mann (Dkt. Nos. 15; 17). Mr. Mann filed objections (Dkt. No. 18). After a review of Judge Kearney’s Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Mr. Mann’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety (Dkt. No. 13). Judge Kearney also filed Proposed Findings and Recommendations in Mann v. Does, 4:15-cv-713 (E.D. Ark. filed Nov. 12, 2015), which was consolidated into this case (Dkt. No. 10). After a review of Judge Kearney’s Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Mr. Mann’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in that case in their entirety (Dkt. No. 10). Dockets.Justia.com Therefore, it is ordered that Mr. Mann’s consolidated complaint is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this the 30th day of November, 2016. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.