Brown v. Teel, No. 4:2015cv00471 - Document 29 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 26 the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects; dismissing without prejudice 2 Complaint; denying the requested relief; denying all pending motions as moot, including 28 Faulkner County Defendants' motion for extension of time; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/29/2016. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Teel Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BILLY BROWN v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:15-cv-471 KGB/JTK SERGEANT TEEL, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 26). No objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed, and the time to file objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 26). Plaintiff Billy Brown’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The relief requested is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot, including the Faulkner County Defendants’ motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 28). This Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this 29th day of November, 2016. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
