Brown v. Pulaski County et al, No. 4:2015cv00423 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing, with prejudice, 1 Plaintiff Gary Brown's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C.§1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order or the accompanying judgment will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/24/2015. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Pulaski County et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION GARY L. BROWN ADC # 115152 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:15CV00423 BSM PULASKI COUNTY et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objection has been filed. After careful consideration, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 Plaintiff Gary Brown’s complaint [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2 Dismissal of this complaint counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g). 3 It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order or the accompanying judgment will not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of August 2015. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
