Stivers et al v. Wright et al, No. 4:2015cv00331 - Document 19 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal constitutes a strike within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/19/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stivers et al v. Wright et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MICHAEL STIVERS, ADC #600740 v. PLAINTIFF 4:15CV00331-SWW-JTK RODNEY WRIGHT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA. 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2015. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
