Rodriguez v. Saline County Detention Facility, No. 4:2015cv00315 - Document 10 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 9 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing, without prejudice, Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/24/2015. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rodriguez v. Saline County Detention Facility Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TIFFANY RODRIGUEZ v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:15CV00315 BSM SALINE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. No objections have been filed. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations, it is concluded they should be adopted, in their entirety, in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of July 2015. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
