King v. King et al, No. 4:2015cv00112 - Document 32 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 31 Findings and Recommendations. The motion for summary judgment 21 filed by Defendants Sherra Spurgers King, Barry Wayne Spurgers, and Elizabeth Ann Spurgers is granted. The claims are dismissed with prejudice. The claims made by plaintiff James Weldon King against defendant United States of America are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/16/2016. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
King v. King et al Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES WELDON KING PLAINTIFF v. NO. 4:15-cv-00112 JM SHERRA SPURGERS KING, BARRY WAYNE SPURGERS, ELIZABETH ANN SPURGERS, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received findings and a recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After a careful, de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Sherra Spurgers King, Barry Wayne Spurgers, and Elizabeth Ann Spurgers is granted. See Document 21. The claims against them are dismissed with prejudice. The claims made by plaintiff James Weldon King against defendant United States of America, though, are dismissed without prejudice. Judgment will be entered for all of the defendants pursuant to these terms. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2016. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
