Billings v. Johnson, No. 4:2014cv00674 - Document 131 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 96 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant Jane/John Doe # 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief in his 94 Fourth Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/18/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Billings v. Johnson Doc. 131 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BRYANT ANTHONY BILLINGS, ADC #093957 * * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON, Doctor, Pulaski County Jail; et al. Defendants. No. 4:14CV00674-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Jane/John Doe # 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief in his Fourth Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 94) is DENIED. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2015. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
