Duhe et al v. Little Rock Arkansas, City of et al, No. 4:2014cv00580 - Document 195 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: JUDGMENT pursuant to the Court's previous 189 Order, and the 194 Opinion and Order entered on this date detailing the Court's rationale, the Court denies plaintiffs Ronald Duhe, Mark Holick, and Spirit One Christian Center, Inc. 9;s 100 second motion for partial summary judgment. The Court grants defendants Sidney Allen and the City of Little Rock, Arkansas's 134 motion for summary judgment. Finally, the Court grants defendant Pulaski County's 138 motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs' claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/27/2017. (jak)
Download PDF
Duhe et al v. Little Rock Arkansas, City of et al Doc. 195 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RONALD DUHE, individually; MARK HOLICK, individually; and SPIRIT ONE CHRISTIAN CENTER, INC., a Kansas Non-Profit Corporation v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:14-cv-580-KGB THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, an Arkansas municipal corporation; SIDNEY ALLEN, in an individual capacity; and PULASKI COUNTY, an Arkansas political subdivision DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Court’s previous Order (Dkt. No. 189), and the Order entered in this matter on this date detailing the Court’s rationale, the Court denies plaintiffs Ronald Duhe, Mark Holick, and Spirit One Christian Center, Inc.’s second motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 100). The Court grants defendants Sidney Allen and the City of Little Rock, Arkansas’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 134). Finally, the Court grants defendant Pulaski County’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 138). Plaintiffs’ claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. It is so adjudged this the 27th day of April, 2017. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com