Webb v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, No. 4:2014cv00402 - Document 63 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 58 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to change the docket to reflect that Defendant Doc Holiday is appr opriately Doc Holliday and Defendant Brawley is Nancy Brawley. Defendants' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendants Doc Holliday, Nancy Brawley, and Shawn Smith are DISMISSED with prejudice. Because there are no remaining Defendants, this case is DISMISSED. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/30/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Webb v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility Doc. 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JEFFERY WEBB, ADC #551387 V. PLAINTIFF 4:14CV00402-BRW-JJV DOC HOLLIDAY, Pulaski County Sheriff; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as its findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court change the docket to reflect that Defendant “Doc Holiday” is appropriately “Doc Holliday” and Defendant “Brawley” is “Nancy Brawley.” 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 53) is GRANTED; 3. Defendants Doc Holliday, Nancy Brawley, and Shawn Smith are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Because there are no remaining Defendants, this case is DISMISSED. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 30th day of October, 2015. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
