Richard et al v. Lonoke County, Arkansas et al, No. 4:2011cv00551 - Document 70 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 69 Opinion and Order entered separately today, all of the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under the constitution and laws of the United States are dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under the laws of the State of Arkansas, so those claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/18/2014. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JERRY RICHARD; AE SAYASAVANH SAMONTRY; and PORNPIEMON PHOUANGMANY v. PLAINTIFFS NO. 4:11CV00551 JLH LONOKE COUNTY, ARKANSAS; JIM ROBERSON, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department; JAMES KULESA, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department; KEENAN CARTER, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department; KEVIN BLAKELY; and BONNIE BLAKELY DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered separately today, all of the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under the constitution and laws of the United States are dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under the laws of the State of Arkansas, so those claims are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2014. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
