Shelton v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al, No. 4:2010cv01519 - Document 70 (E.D. Ark. 2011)
Court Description: JUDGMENT pursuant to 69 Opinion and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing pltf's federal law claims with prejudice and her state law claims without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/29/11. (vjt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Shelton v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al Doc. 70 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AMBER SHELTON, as Administratrix of the Estate of Brenda Shelton, Deceased v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:10CV01519 JLH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; CHERYL MILLER, individually and in her official capacity as an employee of the Arkansas Department of Human Services; SHARON THOMPSON, individually and in her official capacity as an employee of the Arkansas Department of Human Services; JOHN SCHAY, individually and in his official capacity as a physician at the University of Arkansas System; LEVITA FISHER, individually and in her official capacity as an employee of the Arkansas State Hospital; ROSALIND HUNTER, individually; ALBERT KITTRELL; LINDA PARKER; and CHARLES SMITH, individually and in his official capacity as Administrator of the Arkansas State Hospital DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered separately today, Amber Shelton’s claims that arise under the constitution and laws of the United States are dismissed with prejudice. All of Amber Shelton’s claims that arise under the laws of the State of Arkansas are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2011. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
