Williams v. Byrd et al, No. 4:2009cv00836 - Document 53 (E.D. Ark. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 52 Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations; and granting in part and denying in part 17 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Williams's claim about being denied access to the grievance procedure is dismissed with prejudice. In all other respects, the motion for summary judgment is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/22/11. (hph)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Byrd et al Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JASON M. WILLIAMS v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:09-cv-836-DPM-JJV KARL BYRD, Sheriff, Faulkner County; BOBBY BROWN, Major, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office; and NEAL, Corporal, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 52. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the recommendation as its own. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Document No. 17, is granted in part and denied in part. Williams's claim about being denied access to the grievance procedure is dismissed with prejudice. In all other respects, the motion for summary judgment is denied. Dockets.Justia.com So Ordered. -2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
