Oliver v. Does, No. 3:2022cv00035 - Document 8 (E.D. Ark. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, 1 . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/3/2023. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Oliver v. Does Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ARTEZ OLIVER v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:22-cv-00035-KGB-PSH DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 6). No objections have been filed, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Id.). Accordingly, plaintiff Artez Oliver’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute (Dkt. No. 1). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 3rd day of February, 2023. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
