Gray v. Black et al, No. 3:2017cv00293 - Document 10 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 7 Proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Gray's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/4/2017. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gray v. Black et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION RUBBY JAMES GRAY v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00293 BSM K. BLACK, RN/LPN; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff Rubby Gray’s objections [Doc. No. 9] thereto have been received. After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Gray’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g), and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of December 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
