Oliver v. Withfeild et al, No. 3:2016cv00122 - Document 6 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER: Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days from 5/11/2016. To date, plaintiff has not amended his complaint or otherwise responded. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. The 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations are moot. An in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/12/2016. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Oliver v. Withfeild et al Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ARTEZ OLIVER VS. PLAINTIFF 3:16CV00122-BRW-JTK LUTHER WITHFEILD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On May 11, 2016, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days.1 To date, Plaintiff has not amended his complaint or otherwise responded to the May 11, 2016 Order, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.2 The Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Doc. No. 5) are MOOT. An in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2016. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. No. 3. 2 See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
