Schmitt v. Marshall et al, No. 3:2016cv00001 - Document 22 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Schmitt's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and it is hereby certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/2/2017. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Schmitt v. Marshall et al Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JORDAN SCHMITT v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00001 BSM TRISH MARSHALL and SUSAN COX DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 20] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. Plaintiff Jordan Schmitt has not filed objections. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Schmitt’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and it is hereby certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of February 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
