James et al v. Martin, No. 3:2015cv00132 - Document 24 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 and 13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects. The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiffs' claims. The Court denies as moot plaintiffs' motions to proceed IFP, 1 and 4 . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/30/2015. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
James et al v. Martin Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JONNY JAMES and NICHOLAS ADDISON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 3:15-cv-00132-KGB-JJV JOEY MARTIN, Jail Administrator, Poinsett County Detention Center DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on May 27, 2015, and June 17, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 6, 13). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiffs’ claims. 2. The Court denies as moot plaintiffs’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. Nos. 1, 4). 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this the 30th day of November, 2015. ____________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
