Addison et al v. Doe, No. 3:2015cv00108 - Document 22 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The Court dismisses without prejudice this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court denies as moot Mr. Addison's motion to appoint counsel, 19 . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/19/2015. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Addison et al v. Doe Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 3:15-cv-00108-KGB-JTK JANE DOE DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 18). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Therefore, the Court dismisses without prejudice this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court denies as moot Mr. Addison’s motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No. 19). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 19th day of November, 2015. ______________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
