Bausley v. Duncan et al, No. 3:2015cv00095 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/23/2015. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bausley v. Duncan et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION CHARLES L. BAUSLEY v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:15CV00095 BSM BREET DUNCAN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. No objections have been filed. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations, it is concluded they should be adopted in their entirety, in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of July 2015. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
