Brown v. Cox et al, No. 3:2015cv00039 - Document 18 (E.D. Ark. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/29/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
Brown v. Cox et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION KEVIN BROWN ADC #133891 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 3:15CV00039 JM SUSAN COX et al DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 29th day of January, 2016. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.