Walraven et al v. Richmond et al, No. 3:2014cv00182 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiffs' complaint for failure to comply with the Court's Order. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/20/2015. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Walraven et al v. Richmond et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WALRAVEN ADC #141110 KEITH ERIC COLLIER ADC #659984 v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 3:14-cv-00182-KGB DONNIE RICHMOND, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 5). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to comply with the Court’s Order. 2. All pending motions are denied as moot. 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. SO ORDERED this the 20th day of May, 2015. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
