Payne v. Hitt et al, No. 3:2013cv00184 - Document 8 (E.D. Ark. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Because Plaintiff failed to notify the Clerk of his change of address, the Court dismissed plaintiff's 2 Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/25/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
Payne v. Hitt et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JOHN RUFUS PAYNE v. PLAINTIFF 3:13CV00184-SWW-JTK BECKY HITT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. The Clerk of the Court sent a copy of the proposed findings and recommendations to plaintiff. The mail was returned to the Clerk marked “Not at this Address.” Pro se plaintiffs have an obligation to inform the Clerk of any change in address. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Because plaintiff failed to notify the Clerk of his change of address, the Court dismisses plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.