Martin v. Lay et al, No. 2:2022cv00070 - Document 6 (E.D. Ark. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 proposed findings and recommendations; denying as moot 1 Martin's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing this case without prejudice; denying as moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. If Martin wishes to continue with this case, he must submit the $402 filing fee within 15 days of this order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment the case will be reopened. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/13/2022. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Martin v. Lay et al Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION LAWRENCE E MARTIN ADC #106491 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:22-CV-00070-BSM GAYLON LAY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Having reviewed the entire record de novo, Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney’s proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 4] are adopted. Martin’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 2] is denied, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. Martin’s motion to appoint counsel [Doc. No. 3] is denied as moot. If Martin wishes to continue with this case, he must submit the $402 filing fee within fifteen (15) days of this order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment the case will be reopened. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of May, 2022. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
