McCollom v. Garbarini et al, No. 2:2021cv00021 - Document 65 (E.D. Ark. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; denying 25 request for a temporary restraining order or for preliminary injunctive relief; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/10/2022. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McCollom v. Garbarini et al Doc. 65 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION BRADLY MCCOLLOM #08693-028 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:21-cv-00021-KGB-JJV T. GARBARINI, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“Recommendations”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on plaintiff Bradly McCollom’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 29). No objections were filed to the Recommendations, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration of the record before the Court, the Court concludes that the Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 29). Accordingly, Mr. McCollom’s request for a temporary restraining order or for preliminary injunctive relief is denied (Dkt. Nos. 25, 29). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Order would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 10th day of March, 2022. Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
