Hardy v. Beasley, No. 2:2017cv00146 - Document 17 (E.D. Ark. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 13 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing, with prejudice, Curtis Hardy's petition, denying all requested relief, and entering judgment for respondent Beasley. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/2/2018. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hardy v. Beasley Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION CURTIS J. HARDY Reg #01102-043 v. PETITIONER CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00146 BSM GENE BEASLEY, Warden FCC-Forrest City RESPONDENT ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 13] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and petitioner Curtis Hardy’s objections [Doc. No. 16] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Hardy fails to show that section 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective” to test the legality of his detention. See United States v. Lurie, 207 F.3d 1075, 1077–78 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, his petition is dismissed with prejudice, all requested relief is denied, and judgment is entered for respondent Beasley. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of October 2018. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
