Hansberry v. Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, No. 2:2016cv00158 - Document 51 (E.D. Ark. 2018)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 50 Opinion and Order, the Court grants 30 ARDOT's motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff Ramon P. Hansberry, Sr. Mr. Hansberry's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/17/2018. (cmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hansberry v. Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Doc. 51 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION RAMON P. HANSBERRY SR. v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:16-cv-00158-KGB ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered in this matter on this date, the Court grants defendant Arkansas Department of Transportation’s (“ARDOT”) 1 motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff Ramon P. Hansberry, Sr. (Dkt. No. 30). Mr. Hansberry’s claims are dismissed with prejudice. So adjudged this 17th day of October, 2018. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 1 To clarify, Arkansas Department of Transportation was formerly referred to as Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (“AHTD”). The Court referred to ARDOT as AHTD in previous Orders. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
