Muldrow v. Bureau of Prisons et al, No. 2:2015cv00203 - Document 38 (E.D. Ark. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 36 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting defendant Lam's 26 motion to dismiss, and he is dismissed from plaintiff's complaint; and denying plaintiff's 30 motion to amend. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/25/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
Muldrow v. Bureau of Prisons et al Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION LEALON MULDROW, REG. #06344-031 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:15CV00203-JLH-JTK DOES, Federal Prison Officials; and USA DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections.1 After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Lam’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED from plaintiff’s complaint. Document #26. 2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend is DENIED. Document #30. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of May, 2016. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Lealon Muldrow has responded but does not object. He asks that the United States be substituted as the proper defendant, but the docket already reflects that the USA is a defendant.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.