Taylor et al v. Kelley et al, No. 2:2015cv00188 - Document 95 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting the 87 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting Defendants' 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing with prejudice Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/9/2017. (ljb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Taylor et al v. Kelley et al Doc. 95 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION RICKEY T. TAYLOR, ADC #110675, and DE’MARION D. ROBINSON, ADC #150420 V. PLAINTIFFS 2:15CV00188-JM-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and Plaintiffs’ late filed response to the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 78) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2017. ______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
