Morris v. Obi-okoye, No. 2:2014cv00129 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/5/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Morris v. Obi-okoye Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION TOM P. MORRIS, ADC # 144671 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:14CV00129-JLH-JJV NWANNEM UCOAMAKA OBI-OKOYE, Doctor, Correction Care Solutions DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2015. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
