Woodley v. Obi-Okoye et al, No. 2:2014cv00012 - Document 43 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety in all respects 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting defendants' 32 motion for summary judgment; dismissing Mr. Woodley's 2 complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/28/2015. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Woodley v. Obi-Okoye et al Doc. 43 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM LEE WOODLEY ADC #67148 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:14-cv-00012 KGB NWANNEM OBI-OKOYE et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 40), and the objections filed by plaintiff William Lee Woodley (Dkt. Nos. 41, 42). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 32) and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Woodley’s complaint. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. SO ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2015. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
