Coleman v. Lockhart et al, No. 2:2013cv00131 - Document 55 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 54 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claim against defendant Eldridge is DISMISSED without prejudice for f ailure to exhaust. Plaintiff's constitutional claims against defendant Lockhart are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's state law claims against defendant Lockhart are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/4/2014. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Coleman v. Lockhart et al Doc. 55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION DELWRICK D. COLEMAN, ADC #656538 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:13CV00131-JLH-JTK DOUGLAS LOCKHART, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 51) is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Eldridge is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust; 4. Plaintiff’s constitutional claims against defendant Lockhart are DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5. Plaintiff’s state law claims against defendant Lockhart are DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2014. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
