Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al, No. 2:2013cv00020 - Document 50 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 42 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Mr. Crawford's 2 complaint with prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 04/07/2015. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION DAVID JEROME CRAWFORD REG #11307-002 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:13-cv-00020-KGB-HDY FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 42). Plaintiff David Jerome Crawford has filed objections and a statement of necessity (Dkt. Nos. 44, 45), to which defendants have responded (Dkt. No. 46). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Crawford’s complaint. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. SO ORDERED this the 7th day of April, 2015. _____________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
