McWhirter v. Ramsey et al, No. 2:2012cv00199 - Document 76 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 75 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting 62 Defendant Ramsey's motion for summary judgment; granting 65 Defendant Horn, Hopkins and Cowell's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/14/2014. (mmd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McWhirter v. Ramsey et al Doc. 76 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION MICKEY MCWHIRTER, ADC #84977 V. PLAINTIFF 2:12CV00199 SWW/JTR RAYLINA RAMSEY, Classification Officer, Grimes Unit, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Ramsey's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 62) is GRANTED, and the cruel and unusual punishment claim raised against her is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, while the retaliation claim raised against her is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. Defendant Horn, Hopkins, and Cowell's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 65) is GRANTED, and all claims raised against them are DISMISSED, WITH Dockets.Justia.com PREJUDICE. 3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 14th day of April 2014. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
