Hicks v. Kelley et al, No. 2:2011cv00142 - Document 30 (E.D. Ark. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; granting 21 24 27 Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment; dismissing Plaintiff's allegations against Defendants Kelley and Yang with prejudice; and, dismissing Plaintiff's allegations against Defendant Zoldessy without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/1/2012. (dmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hicks v. Kelley et al Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION ANTHONY HICKS v. PLAINTIFF 2:11-cv-00142-SWW-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no timely objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1) Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 21, 24, 27) are GRANTED. 2) Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendants Kelley and Yang are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3) Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendant Zoldessy are DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of August, 2012. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
