-JTR Champion v. Akin et al, No. 2:2011cv00051 - Document 67 (E.D. Ark. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 64 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting 49 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing Defendants Ball and Burl without prejudice; and , dismissing the inadequate medical care claim Plaintiff has raised against Defendant Akin with prejudice. Defendants have thirty days from the entry of this Order to file any further dispositive motions. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/10/2012. (dmn)
-JTR Champion v. Akin et al Doc. 67 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION JERRY CHAMPION, ADC #91354 V. PLAINTIFF 2:11CV0051 JMM/JTR DANNY BURL, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (docket entry #49) is GRANTED. 2. Defendants Ball and Burl are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, because Plaintiff failed to timely and properly exhaust his administrative remedies Dockets.Justia.com against them. 3. The inadequate medical care claim Plaintiff has raised against Defendant Akin, in her official capacity, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. 4. Plaintiff may PROCEED with his inadequate medical care claim against Defendant Akin, in her individual capacity, for monetary damages only. 5. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #58) is DENIED. 6. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 7. Defendants have thirty days from the entry of this Order to file any further dispositive motions. Dated this 10 day of February , 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Terms of Service