Murphy v. Bradley et al, No. 1:2019cv00105 - Document 44 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 39 proposed findings and recommendations; granting 31 motion for summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Stieve, Baiza, Williams, and Gardner; and limiting Murphy's claims against defendants Hughes and Hutchinson to the dates and subject matter set forth in the RD. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/6/2020. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Murphy v. Bradley et al Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION LISA RYAN MURPHY ADC #760343 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:19-CV-00105 BSM TONI BRADLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“RD”) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 39] has been received. After careful review of the record, the RD is adopted. The motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 31] is granted. Defendants Stieve, Baiza, Williams, and Gardner are dismissed without prejudice. Murphy’s claims against defendants Hughes and Hutchinson are limited to the dates and subject matter set forth in the RD, see Doc. No. 39, at 7–8. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2020. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
