Hill v. Reed et al, No. 1:2018cv00089 - Document 21 (E.D. Ark. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/7/2019. (ljb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hill v. Reed et al Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ADAM HILL ADC #601559 v. PLAINTIFF 1:18CV00089-JM-JJV DALE REED, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. No. 13.) No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(1)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 7th day of January, 2019. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
