Autry v. Yancy et al, No. 1:2017cv00058 - Document 8 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 7 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing, without prejudice, 5 Autry's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be grated. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike." Furthermore, it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/10/2017. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Autry v. Yancy et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION SHELBY JAY AUTRY v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:17-CV-00058 BSM JACK YANCY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. Plaintiff Shelby Jay Autry has not submitted objections. After a careful review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Autry’s amended complaint [Doc. No. 5] is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Furthermore, it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of October 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
