Nevels v. Chapman et al, No. 1:2017cv00013 - Document 11 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's amended complaints against defendants are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a &quo t;strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/19/2017. (mcz)
Download PDF
Nevels v. Chapman et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STEVEN LEWIS NEVELS v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:17CV00013-JLH-JTK TRAVIS CHAPMAN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s amended complaints against defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2017. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com